Fractional technology leadership

A technology leader, at the fraction you need

You have engineers. What you don't have is someone accountable for whether the technology is right — who can sit with the board on Tuesday and read a pull request on Wednesday. Appaya takes that seat for two to four days a month.

Monthly retainer

3-month minimum · reviewed quarterly · 2–4 days a month

What it is

Ongoing senior technical leadership, two to four days a month: technical direction, architecture, hiring, delivery discipline, and the engineering relationship with the board — without the cost or commitment of a full-time executive hire. A three-month minimum engagement, reviewed every quarter after.

What you get

What it costs

A monthly retainer, depending on scope and days needed — set at the fit check, before anything is agreed. Three-month minimum, reviewed quarterly: it continues only if the fit still makes sense to both sides.

Who it is for

Who it is NOT for

How an engagement starts

  1. Fit check. Email the situation: team size, what's missing, what "good" would look like. A short call confirms fit and the likely day count.
  2. Scope. Days per month, the specific remit — technical direction, hiring, architecture, delivery, the board relationship — and the price get set in a short written scope.
  3. First quarter. The seat starts: technical direction, hiring input, delivery discipline, and the board relationship, from day one.
  4. Quarterly review. At the three-month mark, and every quarter after, scope and fit get reviewed openly — nothing is locked into a year-long contract.

FAQ

Common questions

How many days a month is this?

Two to four, agreed at the fit check and fixed in the scope — not an hours-billed retainer that creeps.

Is this a job, or a contract?

An ongoing contract engagement, not employment.

What happens after the three-month minimum?

It's reviewed at the three-month mark, and every quarter after — scope, days, and price all stay open to change, not locked in for a year.

Can this turn into a fixed-scope build, or a one-off audit?

Yes — a fractional engagement often surfaces work that's better scoped as a bounded build, or a decision that needs a formal audit first. Either is a separate, explicitly scoped engagement.

Do you work with a team we already have, or bring your own engineers?

The seat directs and works with your existing team — this is leadership capacity, not extra headcount.

What if it's not the right fit after the fit check?

Then there's no engagement, and no cost — nothing is scoped or invoiced until both sides agree it fits.

Want someone accountable for the technology

Email the situation — team size, what's missing, what "good" would look like — to the address below. You'll hear back on fit before anything is scoped.